Most managers I’ve met want to build a high-performance organization. Instinctively, they know that this requires great people. But few of them have ever taken the time to define exactly what they are looking for when it comes to the ideal candidate.

Good leaders begin the recruiting process with a written job description. This generally includes the required educational experience and technical skills. But great leaders need to do more than this. They must take a step back and look at the baseline qualities of the candidate.
They should ask,
- What kind of prospective employees are we trying to attract to our organization?
- What kind of people will it take to get the results we want and others expect?
- What kind of people do we want to surround ourselves with?
- What kind of people will contribute to the culture we are trying to build?
“Warm bodies” are obviously not enough. “Better-than-average” won’t get you there either. Even “really good people” are insufficient. You need higher standards if you are going to achieve your mission.
As I have thought about this, I have reduced these high standards to a sort of formula: “H3S.”
I want to fill our company with people who are humble, honest, hungry, and smart. The “h” in the word “high” represents the first three attributes. The “s” in the word “standards” represents the last attribute. All are equally important, but let me expound on each of them separately.
For simplicity sake, I’m going to use the masculine pronoun below, but it should be understood that the ideal candidate may, of course, be either a man or a woman. Gender is irrelevant.
Humble
A humble person has a good sense of himself. He doesn’t think more highly of himself than he should (pride), nor lower of himself than he ought (poor self-esteem). He is sober-minded, having a realistic grip on his strengths and weaknesses.
He does not exhibit self-ambition. He might be ambitious for the cause, for the company, or for the team, but he is not ambitious for himself. He isn’t overly-concerned about his title, his status, or his position relative to others.
In conversation, he assumes the posture of a learner. He doesn’t pretend that he knows it all or even more than he does. It would certainly never cross his mind to assume that he is the “smartest person in the room.”
He respects other points of view and asks questions to make sure that he understands the other position before criticizing it. He makes other people feel smart and competent.
He is other-centered, no matter who the other person is. He acknowledges “the little people,” those that are easily overlooked by everyone else. He values them and treats them as peers.
Whenever I hire an executive, I always like to take him or her to dinner. I am always interested to see how he treats the hostess, the waiters, and even the busboys. Is he curt? Is he demanding or brusque? Does he treat them with dignity? Is he appreciative? Does he even notice them?
I am always leery of people who “suck-up” to people they want something from and disrespect everyone else. There’s no explaining it away. This is a character flaw. I don’t want someone like this working in my organization. I have no patience for it.
A humble person is open to correction and not defensive. He is quick to admit mistakes and apologize. He knows how to say, “I am sorry. What I did was wrong. Will you please forgive me?” Everyone makes mistakes. The truly humble know how to make it right. Usually, they have had plenty of practice.
He is conscious of the contributions others have made to his life, his projects, and his career. He is quick to give credit to them and express sincere gratitude. Conversely, when others compliment him, he offers a simple “thank you,” without making a big fuss about it.
Finally, he does not consider certain jobs “beneath him.” He sees what needs to be done, pitches in, and is just happy to be part of the team.
Honest
As Dr. Stephen R. Covey points out in The Seven Habits of Highly Successful People:
Honesty is telling the truth—in other words, conforming our words to reality. Integrity is conforming reality to our words—in other words, keeping promises and fulfilling expectations. This requires an integrated character, a oneness, primarily with self but also with life (pp. 195–196).
When I use the term “honesty,” I am referring to both honesty and integrity.
At the most basic level, an honest person does not lie. He does not exaggerate or misrepresent the facts. “Spin control” is a foreign concept. So is bragging. If anything, he is given to understatement, especially about his own accomplishments.
He does not withhold negative information. He gives you “the good, the bad, and the ugly.” He has the courage to face reality head-on and make his words conform to it. He would never ask someone else to lie on his behalf or to cover for him.
He is also honest in giving others feedback. He is able to be direct without being hurtful. He doesn’t create unnecessary drama. He doesn’t say anything about those who are absent that he wouldn’t say if they were present.
Finally, an honest person keeps his commitments, even when it is difficult, expensive, or inconvenient. If he said he would do it, he does it. You can take it to the bank.
Early in my career, I was able to land the job as a marketing director at one of the larger publishing houses. The only problem was that I didn’t have any experience. None!
So, my new boss put me on a kind of “90-day probationary period.” He said, “Look, I think you will do fine, but let’s agree to a 90-day trial run. If everything goes as planned, I will give you a raise equal to 10% of your annual salary. If not, we’ll shake hands and part company as friends.” I enthusiastically agreed, rolled up my sleeves, and got to work.
Knowing that this was an enormous opportunity, I read everything I could on marketing. I worked hard. I got to the office early and left late. I was determined to prove to my boss that he had made the right decision.
At the end of the 90-day period, I was actually looking forward to my review. I knew I had exceeded his expectations. I was confident I would get the raise.
My boss called me into his office. After the usual pleasantries, he said, “Mike, you have done an outstanding job. You have exceeded my expectations in every way. I am very proud of you.”
“But I have one problem,” he continued. “Last week, our parent company instituted a salary and wage freeze. They have refused to consider any exceptions.”
My heart sank. Though I tried to appear professional, I’m sure that my disappointment was written all over my face.
Then he handed me an envelope and said the most amazing thing. “In that envelope is a check for the amount I promised you. It’s not from the company, but from me personally. I have discussed this with my wife, and we are both in agreement. You don’t have a choice about whether or not to accept it. So don’t even think about it. I made a commitment to you. You lived up to your end of the bargain—and then some—and I want to live up to mine.”
As a young businessman, that act made an enormous impression on me. Not only did it bond me to my boss—still one of my best friends—for life, it has provided concrete guidance in every tough decision I have ever made.
Hungry
A hungry person is someone with an appetite. Metaphorically speaking, his last meal is already a fading memory. He wants to eat, and he wants to eat now. All he can think about is food!
In other words, he doesn’t dwell on his past accomplishments. He is never satisfied. He is always reaching for more—setting higher goals. He is driven to exceed whatever expectations have been imposed upon him. This is just a part of his make-up.
A hungry person is intellectually curious. He reads constantly—newspapers, magazines, and books. Lots of books. (Why would you want to work at a publishing company unless you love books?) He loves learning new things and sharing what he is learning with others.
He doesn’t get stuck in ruts. He is open to new ideas and new ways of solving old problems. He is always looking for the best solution and embraces change if it will take him—or the company—to a new level.
He comes to meetings prepared, having completed his homework. In the meeting, he is an active listener, asking lots of questions and taking notes. After the meeting, he follows up. He completes his assignments on-time without someone having to prod him to do so. He is relentless when it comes to execution.
In short, a hungry person “plays full out,” holding nothing back. More than anything, he wants to win and is willing to pay the price to do so.
Smart
A smart person usually scores high on traditional IQ tests. But not always. You have to be careful. Some people are book-smart but street-stupid. I’d like to have both. But if forced to choose, I’ll take the street-smart candidate.
A smart person is a quick study. He can “connect the dots” without a lot of help. He has a natural ability to “think laterally,” that is, across disciplines. He can apply what he learns in one field or category to another.
He is comfortable using metaphors and analogies. He knows how to make complex subjects simple without confusing himself and everyone else in the process.
I was a philosophy major. Some of the books I had to read were really difficult. I remember reading, re-reading, and then re-re-reading some particularly tough passages. Then it dawned on me. If this guy is so smart, why can’t he explain this in a way that is easy to follow? Maybe this is a case of “the emperor has no clothes.”
In my experience, confusion sometimes masquerades as complexity. Listening to an explanation, you might be tempted to think that you’re just not smart enough to understand the issue. But in reality, the presenter doesn’t understand it well enough to make it simple. I want people working for me who are smart enough to work through the complexity in order to arrive at simple explanation.
A smart person also asks thoughtful questions. He sees connections between topics that others miss. He is aware of nuances. He has diverse interests, which come in handy when he is trying to understand new information.
He is also able to focus mentally, for long periods of time if necessary. He doesn’t give up quickly. He keeps pressing until he gets the insight or clarity he needs. He is a creative problem-solver.
Finally, smart people have cognitive intelligence. That’s most of what I have covered here. But that alone is not sufficient. In my opinion, a successful candidate also needs emotional, relational, and even spiritual intelligence to succeed.
Summary
It’s hard to find the buried treasure unless you have a map. It’s difficult to win a scavenger hunt unless you have a list. And, it’s impossible to hire the right people unless you know exactly what you are looking for.
At Thomas Nelson, we want to hire people who are H3S: humble, honest, hungry, and smart. If we can do that consistently, we will build a great and enduring organization.
Note: I plan to write a follow-up post with a list of questions designed to find out if the person you are interviewing meets the High Standard you require for employees.
Technorati Tags: hiring, human relations, leadership, management, recruiting
Building Champions has been coaching me since 2002. They have taught me to be more proactive and intentional in both my business and personal life. Visit their Web site to learn more and see their special offer for my blog readers.
Related posts:







In:
Tags: 















FWIW, these principles seem similar to those found in Covey’s book, in the recent “The Mormon Way of Doing Business” by Jeff Benedict (Warner Books) and those in several books about Christians in Business.
The dinner test – so true!
Those executives who do not even notice a waiter appear arrogant. They don’t value “unimportant” work.
Concerning the corporate world, it makes me worry that they don’t value little results of their team and actually disrespect the work of subordinates. Such executives think in terms of hierarchies and a constant power struggle.
Kent,
I agree; I don’t think there’s anything original here. These are universal principles. In fact, Patrick Lencioni mentions three of the four in his book, The Four Obsessions of an Extraordinary Executive. However, common sense is often uncommon in practice. I really wrote this as a reminder to myself. I wanted to establish a baseline for hiring new employees.
Thanks for your input!
Mike
Wow, great litmus test. Who wouldn’t want to work for an organization that values these attributes? The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People should be required reading for most everybody, along with Dale Carnegie’s book. A postive, can-do attitude would also be on my list. Negativity is rampant and even with folks who are intelligent and teachable, the constant whining tends to bring down everyone’s spirit.
Mike, I would encourage you to focus more on getting excellent people into the Thomas Nelson organization. As someone who has worked closely with Christian publishers (especially Thomas Nelson) over the last 5 years, I can honestly say that there is great room to improve in this area.
I have worked with a handful of smart and talented executives at the highest level within Nelson but from the VP level down to acquisitions, editing and design the positions often seem to be filled with “friends from church” and other non-qualified people. This may sound harsh but after pondering the problems I see with your organization it is the one that really stands out as a possible root. Other Christian publishers I have worked with have savvy, driven and educated people in similar positions that really contrast a majority of the people I have seen at Nelson. They are good people that I love dearly but too often they are operating above their abilities and education.
As I think more about it I wonder if this is partly due to promotion within instead of hiring externally to fill middle management positions. You have a lot of churn like many organizations and the people leaving seem to often be the high performance, driven people moving on to other opportunities. It is often the “warm bodies” that are left that somehow find their way into a promotion because they have been there 2 years, 5 years, etc. I am not saying I disagree with this in general but the result in Nelson’s situation seems to be negative.
I apologize if these comments are negative. I do see great improvement in the organization since you have moved into the position of CEO but I was hoping that the changes would come more swiftly. But these things take time and I encourage you to continue using this blog to personally mentor your organization like you have been doing.
Mr. Hyatt,
What a wonderful post to articulate exactly what you are looking for. It is also something that employees can strive towards, because not everyone is born or brought up with these traits, but can certainly work on them through personal improvement.
Wouldn’t it be excellent if everyone in the business world lived by these standards? I found it a hard adjustment right after college (now a long time ago) to go from the “ideal management theory” to what actually exists in the real world – politics, “me-me-me”, etc. Not all companies are like that, and it’s refreshing to hear that Thomas Nelson is not among that bunch.
Here is a challenge – what do you think your employees would say about it? Would you consider a survey that asks them how they think the company’s employees as a group rate on the 4 characteristics? It would certainly be interesting to see if your philosophy held up to your employees’ feelings about their coworkers.
I don’t normally have the time or care enough to read the comments or respond on blogs. However, I appreciate your suggestions on working more effectively and this last post took me by surprise. I have worked closely with Thomas Nelson off and on for 10 years – dealing with many different levels from execs to editors to assistants. And disagree with the statement about underqualified employees seeming to be rampant throughout. True – internal promotions happen frequently and should IF that internal candidate is indeed qualified.
However, the company leadership is what needs to be looked to since they make the decisions. They are the ones that promote and they are the ones that help breed the attitude of not ever being satisfied or excelling WHERE you are, but rather always looking for the NEXT promotion. Not to say we shouldn’t strive for more but wouldn’t it be more beneficial for everyone if people remained in a position and really excelled before “automatically” jumping to the next level in 18 months — the next level that they often aren’t qualified for and the next level that gets little to no guidance from those previously in that position or from those that supervise them. Also just as an aside — 99% of those “warm bodies” are the hardest working, most loyal, honest bodies in the company…that may not be as capable of showing off their abilities, and therefore aren’t recognized as being as smart, talented or qualified as their superior, who in actuality may or may not be.
The other reality that I won’t go into but that everyone knows: salary and benefits is often what gets in the way of hiring qualified employees. Especially external candidates.
These are all great comments. I am reading them all and soaking them all in. Keep them coming! Thanks.
A couple of comments seem to want to downplay your posting – that you are aggregating information from other sources and not presenting anything new. To be blunt, I find these comments to be rather prideful.
There are some ideas / concepts that can be learned and integrated into our personal actions easily, but, it has been my experience that as the world drifts away from divine truth, it is dificult to learn and maintain not only our belief system, but our ability to act according to that system.
I found your posting very informative. It reminds me of what I hold of great worth and in thinking about H3S, what kind of course corrections might be necessary in how I act so that I act in accordance to my beliefs. It is far too easy to walk amongst the populous and forget what we are.
I am not involved in the publishing industry and came across your other blog while I was researching tablet PC’s. I have both sites bookmarked and checkup on what you have to say on a regular basis.
Thank you for sharing your insight.
In regards to “Anonymos #1″
Think of it. All of these “warm bodies” and “friends from church” yet we have been and for that matter still are number one.
Humm…..
In response to Anonymous #1 above, I believe your information might have been correct at one time but is outdated. Since I oversee hiring for the company I can say definitively that the best candidates, both outside the company and within, are considered for almost every opening and certainly for middle management and above. I saw “almost” because we do prefer our own support staff for entry-level professional positions in many cases. About half the positions we fill at middle management are from outside the company and we feel very good about our talent level. You are, of course, free to disagree.
Dear Mr Hyatt,
The H3S symbol is excellently summarising what is the 9,9 in Grid. I feel one aspect to be missing however, that is the teamwork. Naturally, if all these traits are present in one’s behaviour the teamwork flows automatically out of the guy’s attitude towards coporate, team and individual objectives.
Alas, the workforce in general lacks H3S or 9,9 qualities, let them be CEOs, mid-level managers or field workers. In principle each agrees with these qualities, in parctice a rare few can live them only.
How to obtain these traits is a question many counselling services make themselves quick to give the best answer. What they tend to shun however is that CEOs, mid-level managers or field workers are all fallable without their teams’ support.
Individual excellence has a drop effect only which soon gets vaporized if left alone in any environment. Individuals and their environment pulse together mutually demanding a dual focus and care.
A critical balance is the key otherwise H3S or 9,9 qualities suffer losses immediatelly.
Why have I written all these down commenting on you blog? Practically, since in Hungary the CEOs I meet all strive to have a 9,9 type workforce. But they get stiff when I suggest to have a 360 degree company survey with the CEO included. As if they knew something about themselves…
It seems to be hard to believe that they shape their own corporate culture by their own behaviour.