Do You Make These 8 Mistakes When You Twitter?

Twitter is a great tool for extending your influence. You can engage your “tribe” in real time, offering leadership and assistance in a way that would have been impossible just a couple of years ago.

Girl with Shocked Expression on Laptop PC - Photo courtesy of ©iStockphoto.com/Stockphoto4u, Image #10235999

However, Twittering has not been without its challenges. I think I have made just about every mistake you can make. Assuming you want to grow your influence and increase your follower count (and I realize that not everyone does), here are eight mistakes to avoid:

  1. Using a difficult-to-remember username. In my opinion, your username should be as close to your real name—or your brand name—as possible. This facilitates engagement. If people can’t remember your username or have to look it up, most won’t bother. As a result, you’ll be left out of the conversation. In addition, a real name communicates authenticity and accessibility. Don’t hide behind a made-up name that is only meaningful to you. If you want to change your username to something better, you can do this in the Twitter settings panel without setting up a new account or losing your existing followers.
  2. Posting more than about 120 characters. If you want to be “re-tweeted,” thus extending your influence, you need to keep your messages shorter than the legal limit of 140 characters. A re-tweet, by definition, will carry the abbreviation “RT” plus your username. In my case, that would be “RT @MichaelHyatt” plus a space—seventeen characters total. If you subtract that from 140 you get 123. That means my messages cannot be longer than 123 characters without requiring people to edit my messages before re-tweet them. If you want to get re-tweeted, make it easy for your followers.
  3. Tweeting too little—or too much. Admittedly, this is a judgment call. Like the Story of the Three Bears, somewhere between too little and too much is “just right.” Personally, I shoot for 12–14 posts a day. (It takes less time than you may think.) I am not suggesting that this is the ideal goal. It depends on your goals and your audience’s expectations. However, if you are only Twittering a couple of times a day or less, it is too little to get on my radar. If you are Twittering too much, you become annoying, and I will eventually unfollow you. I am simply suggesting that you develop a strategy and be intentional about the number of messages you post.
  4. Asking for more than you give. Obviously, spammers and most direct marketers fall into this category. They mistakenly see Twittering as just another form of “interruption marketing.” However, here I am referring to legitimate Twitter users who use their account to converse. But they also post too many messages promoting their company, products, or services. You must think of the Twitter community as a “social bank account.” You can make withdrawals, but only if you deposit more than you take out. I shoot for a 20-to-1 ratio. In other words, I want to post 20 or so helpful resources or bits of information for every post in which I ask for help solving a problem, supporting a cause, or touting one of my company’s products, etc.
  5. Using the reply function when you should use a direct message. In my opinion, 90% of replies (where you address a person you follow publicly) should be direct messages (where you address a person you follow and who follows you privately). This is not because the information is confidential. Obviously, those messages should be private or—just to be safe—communicated via another medium. The problem is that it is too difficult to follow the conversation when replies are used. Your tweets become intelligible to anyone who can’t remember the entire conversation. They are just more noise. For example, if I reply with “@SteveJobs You totally rock. I love that idea,” no one knows what I am talking about unless they can recall Steve’s message to me. It just adds more clutter to my followers’ data stream. The key question to ask is this: is my reply relevant to anyone other than the person I am replying to?
  6. Posting when you are frustrated or angry. Twittering is so immediate, that it is easy to post something in a moment of frustration that you later regret. I have done it numerous times. The problem with all written communication—especially Twitter—is that it is difficult to communicate context or nuance in your messages. Negative emotions are better expressed in person if they must be expressed at all. If you Twitter these messages, you risk offending the person it was intended for and turning off a large percentage of your followers. Is this really the “brand impression” you want to create?
  7. Not creating a good profile page. Your profile page is the first thing that potential followers check. It should look intentional and be consistent with the brand image you are trying to convey. At the very least, upload your photo. This humanizes you by putting a face with a name. However, make sure the photo is consistent with your brand. In fact, I recommend that you come up with one “avatar” photo and use it with all social media. This delivers a consistent brand message. In addition, take the time to fill out the “bio” field. People want to know something about the people they follow. I even link to a custom About page on my blog that acknowledges that the reader got there via Twitter and goes into more depth for those who are interested.
  8. Failing to engage in the conversation. Twitter is not intended to be a monologue. In fact, the entire premise behind Web 2.0—of which Twitter is just one technology—is that people want to engage in a dialog. This makes it more demanding than other forms of media. In other words, unless you are a celebrity, you can’t just broadcast your message and walk away. But this is also what makes it more powerful. When you engage with your customers and constituents, you have the opportunity to learn from them and influence them. Admittedly, I don’t respond to every reply (i.e., Twitter “mention”), but I do respond to every direct message, unless it is clear that it is spam.

Hopefully, this list will enable you to avoid some of the common Twitter mistakes. If you are going to make mistakes, at least you can make different mistakes.

Question: What did I miss? What Twitter mistakes do you see others making?
Disclosure of Material Connection: I have not received any compensation for writing this post. I have no material connection to the brands, products, or services that I have mentioned. I am disclosing this in accordance with the Federal Trade Commission’s 16 CFR, Part 255: “Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising.”

Get Free Email Updates!

Exclusive bonus! Subscribe today and you’ll receive a link to download my brand new e-book, Creating a Personal Life Plan, FREE. This step-by-step guide will help you design the life you’ve always wanted.

WestBow Press

Please note: I reserve the right to delete comments that are snarky, offensive, or off-topic. If in doubt, read My Comments Policy.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/joannamuses joanna

    One of the things that annoys me the most is the inclusion of the phrase "please RT" in tweets that don't have information genuinely beneficial to everyone else (eg. occasional use for a fundraiser for/information on a worthwhile cause is okay). Putting "Please RT" on normal twitter content makes people look ether like beggars or like they are arrogant because it gives the impression that they expect people love them enough to RT their ramblings. If it is worth retweeting people will do it without being nagged.
    My recent post Book review: Theresa Flores- The Slave Across the Street

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/michaelhyatt Michael Hyatt

      I hate this, too. I want to say, “Instead of begging me for a RT, how about write something compelling that makes me want to re-tweet it without you begging!” But of course that would be rude and probably misunderstood!

  • http://jennifervmiller.com Jennifer V. Miller

    Michael,

    I would add: "Take care in the way you use automation tools." They are a time saver, sure, but people can spot an auto-DM a mile away. Another example: If you use HootSuite to pre-set tweets to occur throughout the day, they show up on Tweetdeck as from HootSuite. It's not a bad thing, but somehow, when I see that, I lose the sense that the person is "in the moment" with me.
    My recent post Thank Your Mentor Today

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/michaelhyatt Michael Hyatt

      I agree. I use SocialOomph to re-post content from my archives. But you have to be careful. One time I had one of these fire in the middle of a speaking engagement. A person in the audience was following me and thought, Wait a minute! Someone else is tweeting for him. Fortunately, I was able to talk with her and explain the concept behind scheduled tweets. But it was a negative brand impression for me.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/success2you John Richardson

      I read a Twitter tutorial by @nik_nik that suggested a combination approach. She suggested setting up about 4 or 5 automated tweets at key times throughout the day and then intersperse timely tweets as things progress. This would definitely make them feel more "in the moment" as you suggest.

  • Pingback: uberVU - social comments

  • John MacAdam

    Great list. I agree with all except the direct message one. When I reply @stevejobs only the friends in my list following @stevejobs will see the tweet in their stream. If my friends are talking to each other, I am usually interested. If they are talking to a stranger, I am less interested.

    I agree with Joanna. Please RT is too pushy.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/michaelhyatt Michael Hyatt

      I think it comes down to how many people you are following and whether it is relevant to ALL those who follow both of you. Thanks.

      • John MacAdam

        True. I'm sure this is much more noticeable to somebody with the amount of followers you have :)

  • http://twitter.com/FearlessSelling @FearlessSelling

    Hi Michael,

    I also get tired of people who send out the same message multiple times in a short time span or who use a teaser clue and url to direct you to their website or Amazon to buy a product or book. I have nothing against marketing your products/services on Twitter, just be upfront about it.

    Cheers!
    Kelley
    http://www.FearlessSellingBlog.com

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/michaelhyatt Michael Hyatt

      How would you suggest that people do this? This is one I also struggle with. In fact, I was discussing this very thing with the founder of Cmp.ly on Friday. How do you link to the product or service without having to create a second link for a disclosure. It can get cumbersome quickly! The good news is that he understands the problem and is working on a solution.

      Thanks for your comment.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/success2you John Richardson

    Timely advice, Michael. One of the things that is very helpful in getting my message out to people who would be interested in my content is the #hashtag. There are hundreds of popular ones, but they allow people on Twitter to find your content by category. These are especially helpful when the tweet does not contain a keyword that people could search on. I have my account setup that when I use the hastag #in it automatically posts my tweet to my Linked-In page. Very helpful.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/michaelhyatt Michael Hyatt

      That is one I should have mentioned. Hash tags are a great way to get discovered and to get your message to potential followers.

      • http://intensedebate.com/people/success2you John Richardson

        I put a post up today on my blog how I discovered the true power of #hashtags by accident. I was amazed how useful they are.
        My recent post The Elephant In The Room

  • http://www.buildthatlist.com/list-building/your-small-list-can-equal-big-profits/ Tom

    I hadn't ever thought about retweeting when writing my tweets. I am sure to have shorter ones from now on. I will definitely agree with the posting to often. Every day I unsubscribe from at least 1 or 2 Tweeters who seem to hog my page with their countless tweets.

  • vizionheiry

    Great list except for #5 ACtually replies are how the average user differentiates a spammer or marketer from a person engaging with the client. It’s easy to follow conversations on Twitter with a client. Now if a person wants to filter out mentions or replies, they can stop using the web and use a client like most power users.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/michaelhyatt Michael Hyatt

      I use a Twitter client (currently Tweetdeck) but I still find the replies annoying if it is just a conversation between two others. PeopleBrowsr allows for threaded tweets, but it really only applies to you. I still think it is confusing and prefer DMs.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/joannamuses joanna

    Another one is long multi-word hash tags that no-one would ever search for. If people want to say something, they should say it in normal form, not long hard to read hashtag form like #whatanawesomecamp
    My recent post Jesus ain't no hippy

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/michaelhyatt Michael Hyatt

      Agreed. The shorter the better, especially if you want to be re-tweeted.

  • http://recuperandoiltempo.wordpress.com/ Andrea

    I’m Italian and I tweet both in English and in Italian.
    In English, since I want to connect with more people.
    In Italia, since Italy is my first “sphere of influence”.
    Do you agree with this or do you think this is a mistake, since it can annoy my followers?

  • http://twitter.com/allie912 @allie912

    Some people I follow are really interesting until they begin to follow some sporting event on TV. Then they feel compelled to tweet about every score or activity in the game. Talk about clutter!

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/joannamuses joanna

      this one gets particularly annoying when someone is obsessively tweeting a sport that isn't even played in your country!
      My recent post Jesus ain't no hippy

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/michaelhyatt Michael Hyatt

      This drives me crazy, too. One or two tweets are fine, but I don't need a play-by-play. If I am that interested in the game, I will just watch it!

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/btravisbrown Travis Brown

      I totally agree. Just yesterday, during the Saints game, my phone was going nuts because one guy posted 7 or 8 tweets about the Saints game within one hour. I was "this" close to unfollowing him.

    • JD in Canada

      I absolutely agree. To me, the same applies to watching movies and television shows. The babble becomes unintelligible if the listener isn't familiar with the sports/movies/shows, (I'm in that category) or it may give away how the game/movie/show ends to the person who hasn't watched it yet but plans to.

  • http://twitter.com/AndreaAresca @AndreaAresca

    I'm Italian and I tweet both in English and in Italian.
    In English, to connect with more people who have similar interests.
    In Italian, since it is my first "sphere of influence".
    Do you think this is a mistake, since it can annoy my followers?
    My recent post Non dimenticare quello che hai

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/michaelhyatt Michael Hyatt

      That's a great question. Honestly, I don't know. I follow some people who tweet in both Portuguese and Spanish. But, like you, they also tweet in English. I pretty much just ignore the languages I don't understand.

      What does everyone else think?

      • http://intensedebate.com/people/btravisbrown Travis Brown

        I think you're right on Michael. Only if you were a multinational company or something like that would you want to have different Twitter usernames for different languages.

      • http://www.lindseynobles.com Lindsey Nobles

        I do get "annoyed" when I see other languages in my twitter feed. And typically if someone's profile is not in English, I won't follow them. It is not that I am not interested in what they have to say. It's that I literally can't understand them.

        My advice would be to create a separate profile for each language.

    • JD in Canada

      I think it's a great way to learn another language in small, manageable doses. I'd love it!

  • Vince

    My understanding is if you hit reply on a tweet, your @ message only goes to the person you’re mentioning, and it does not show up in your followers’ timeline. However if you start a brand new tweet and @ someone, then it will show up on your followers’ timeline.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/michaelhyatt Michael Hyatt

      Actually, I think the way it works is that a reply can be seen by everyone who follows you AND the person whose name you have mentioned.

  • http://www.flowingfaith.blogspot.com Mari-Anna Stalnacke

    First of all, I want to thank you for offering so much value for your readers. You do give much more you ask!

    I do agree with you but #1 is more difficult for people with longer names. It would be nice and easy to use my whole name as a handle but not quite possible as is. Maybe I need to rethink this anyhow!

    Thank you for your generous leadership.
    Blessings!
    My recent post Living in the Presence of the Holy Spirit

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/michaelhyatt Michael Hyatt

      Thanks for your kind words. With a longer name, you might consider first initial plus last name or first name plus last name initial. The goal is to make it easy-to-remember.

  • http://www.patlayton.net Pat Layton

    Michael,
    This post addresses some very specific things that I do not "get" about Twitter.
    One of the comments you make is the very thing that keeps me a bit "Twitter Shy". You say to DM verses Reply as a way of cutting down random Twitter chatter and I completely agree. To me, it is bothersome to scroll through a bunch of random comments and personal dialog that not only doesn't include the general reader but kind of shuts them out. Why tweet? Why not Text??
    My question is how can someone "engage" in a conversation in a way that inspires discussion unless it is a public Reply??
    Secondly, can you DM someone who is NOT following you. The times I have done that I get a Twitter "No Take" notice.
    Thank you for your fabulous Blog. I print it off almost daily to read, take notes and learn from. Not only that but you have blessed me so with some of your introductions. I love following Anne @ Flower Dust!
    Blessings to you,
    Pat Layton
    My recent post Is Anyone Crying?

    • http://www.sixdegreeswebdesign.com SixDegreesPGH

      - You can send a reply that everyone sees automatically without having to look at your timeline (list of tweets) by putting a period in front of the @username. Also, some Twitter clients have something like "in reply to" where you can see what a response was sent about and follow that thread.

      - Direct Messages require both people to be following each other. They are sort of like private messages on Twitter.

      • http://www.sixdegreeswebdesign.com SixDegreesPGH

        Correcting myself.

        You can’t DM someone who isn’t following you….which if you’re DMing them I’m assuming you’re both following each other since DMs are like private messages on Twitter.

        • http://intensedebate.com/people/michaelhyatt Michael Hyatt

          This is why I auto-follow everyone who follows me. It make DMs possible. Yes, it results in some spam, but I think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. Thanks.

  • Terry Odell

    I'm new to Twitter and don't hang around too much for most of the reasons you've given.

    Also – it appears you can't DM someone who isn't following you, so it bugs me when I get a DM and can't reply directly.

    I tend to ignore the conversational tweets (although have been guilty of using them with family).

    I have no clue how people can keep track. I have a measly 200-ish number of followers, and I'd say 90% of the tweets roll off before I see them.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/michaelhyatt Michael Hyatt

      I would encourage you to use a Twitter “client” like TweetDeck. It allows you to create “columns” of people you follow—separate data streams, if you will. This way you can prioritize the people you follow. I have one column for family, one for personal friends, one for fellow-employees, etc.

      • http://www.facebook.com/dariengabriel Darien Gabriel

        Can you do this with Hootsuite?

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/btravisbrown Travis Brown

    Great post, first of all. Anytime I'm ever trying to convince one of my friends or family members to Twitter, I send them to your site. Most always, they begin Twittering to try it out and never stop.

    Secondly, one thing I struggle with on Twitter is knowing how much to post. Most of my followers (which are mostly people I know directly, at this point) don't post more than 5 times per day or so. I would like to post more, like 10 times per day or so, but I'm afraid that if I start posting more than about 5 times per day, I may lose some followers. What do you think is the best approach to this conundrum?

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/michaelhyatt Michael Hyatt

      I would start ramping it up and then ask for feedback. My family is faithful to tell me if I am posting too much. It took some experimentation to find the right level for me.

    • http://twitter.com/Jill_Be @Jill_Be

      I've been pondering this one while skimming comments, wondering if anybody else picked up on it. I'm with you, and was trying to hone in on "how much is too much?" I think it depends on the content. Generally speaking, more than 6 per day on average and I'm going to quit reading your tweets, maybe unfollow you. Being talked AT isn't social media engagement. Saving talking at people for blogging, and use twitter to engage and develop relationships.

      • http://intensedebate.com/people/btravisbrown Travis Brown

        @Jill_Be, I tend to agree with you on that. But, I think if I increase my posting by just twice more per day, it may encourage them to Twitter more, thereby enriching and extending the conversation, which is the goal. But, I know what you mean about "over-posters". I have definitely blocked some that just take up space with their posts. What do you think?

  • http://twitter.com/jeaston1 @jeaston1

    For business Twitterers, I would say jumping in too early. Business owners should already have a working marketing strategy in place (3 or so tactics that are bringing in regular new business). Without this in place most business owners will get sucked in by SM gurus and media speaking to the windfall of business you will get from Twitter, FaceBook, etc.

    SM success takes a lot of work (and knowledge) and if business owners rely on it up front for new business 99% are sure to fail. Take a deep breath, build your core marketing engine then add social media to it…Thanks Michael for kicking off a lively discussion.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/michaelhyatt Michael Hyatt

      In that regard, I think a great blog or Web page is central. This is my “homebase.” You have to have a place you own and control to link people to.

      Thanks for joining in the discussion!

  • http://emuelle1.typepad.com Eric S. Mueller

    I’m definitely guilty of tweeting while frustrated. It’s way too easy.

    My Twitter pet peeves are people who engage in “Follow Friday” and fire of several tweets of people they recommend or others to follow.

    I have no problem with scheduled tweets and self- promotions, but I get annoyed and unfollow people who run the same tweets over and over again like commercials on AM talk radio.

    I agree about the reply/DM issue. I follow one pastor in particular who can fire off 30 replies in a row that are meaningless to me and add nothing to my stream. I mostly use Twitterrific on my iPhone so I have to balance my following to a certain amount of tweets over a period of time that won’t exceed 200 so I can pick up where I left off.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/michaelhyatt Michael Hyatt

      I thought about speaking out against Follow Friday, but I do benefit from the mentions. I know people are trying to be helpful, but I find them to be pretty much noise and can get annoying. Thanks.

  • http://forrest-long.blogspot.com Forrest Long

    That's great advice. I used to think Twitter was a waste of time, and what could one say in so few words, but once I started using it I find it's a great communication tool. And I get alot out of following your tweets as well as your blog. They go together.
    My recent post Blog survey- Important

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/MaurilioAmorim MaurilioAmorim

    Well said, Mike. Even after three years I still fail to DM people when replying to a conversation. Thanks for the reminder.

    Early on my Twittering days I posted my top 10 ways to get in trouble in Twitter. It's one of my most popular posts: http://bit.ly/7AKbcG

    • http://www.lindseynobles.com Lindsey Nobles

      Maurilio, that is one of my favorite blog posts by anyone, ever. It is hilarious.
      My recent post Formula for Assertive Communication

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/michaelhyatt Michael Hyatt

      I agree with Lindsey. This is my all-time favorite blog post of yours!

      • http://www.inthenameoflove.org Bianca Juarez

        I just read the post and LAUGHED! It was great :)

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/MaurilioAmorim MaurilioAmorim

    Well said, Mike. Even after three years I still fail to DM people when replying to a conversation. Thanks for the reminder.

    Early on my Twittering days I posted my top 10 ways to get in trouble in Twitter. It's one of my most popular posts: http://bit.ly/7AKbcG

  • http://twitter.com/jazcat @jazcat

    I am wondering what the best way is to ReTweet and add a short comment. Is it considered OK to slightly change the original tweet, just remove some spaces or an unimportant word or hashtag. Many times people do not follow your rule #2 so I cannot ReTweet unless I do this.

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/michaelhyatt Michael Hyatt

      Yes, I think that is acceptable, so long as you don't change the meaning.

  • JD in Canada

    Great tips! Thank you for taking the time to share them.

    My single biggest pet peeve about Twitter would be #6 "Posting when you're frustrated / angry". There are some who do it constantly. It becomes a black hole of negativity. It's what makes me hover over the "unfollow" button the most.

    The other pet peeve is the "T M I" tweets. Too Much Information. If you're sick, we don't need allllllllllll the details. If you're PMS'ing, spare us, please. If you're in the bathroom, get.off.the.phone. We don't need to know your *every* move.

    I love that you added that for some people, growing influence and followers is not the goal. Thank you for acknowledging that :)

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/michaelhyatt Michael Hyatt

      I laughed out loud at your “*every* move” comment. ;-)

  • http://www.theincarnate.blogspot.com Matt

    Thanks for posting, Michael. I just signed up for Twitter a few days ago after a period of reticence about it. My only regret for not getting on the bandwagon sooner is not being able to use my name for my username.

    Regards,

    Matt
    My recent post Clarke Forsythe on Overturning Roe v. Wade

  • http://theincarnate.blogspot.com Matt

    Sorry about that link… I didn't realize the box was checked below!

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/michaelhyatt Michael Hyatt

      No problem. This is designed to help generate a little traffic for you.

  • http://www.onmission.com Adam

    Good stuff! Thanks for leading YOUR tribe so well.

  • http://liveinthenameoflove.blogspot.com/ Bianca

    This is a personal issue I have, but when people RT their own praise, it's quite annoying (and arrogant).

    Would you address the benefits of following everyone?
    My recent post silent worship…

  • http://twitter.com/idowens @idowens

    I hadn't considered #5; thanks for the fresh thoughts, Michael.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/michaelhyatt Michael Hyatt

    The major benefit is two-fold: (1) I think it is courteous and (2) it makes DMs possible. (You can't DM someone who isn't following you.)

    I know some people object, because they think How could I follow so many people!. It's easier than you think, if you use a Twitter client like TweetDeck. You can segregate your followers into columns with different priorities. I have separate ones for family, friends, colleagues, etc.

  • Doug Fields

    Michael, can you really engage in the conversation when you follow 71,000 people? What’s the philosophy to follow as many as follow you? It doesn’t seem realistic that you can really listen to those you follow. I follow 100 and have 7000 followers but often think I should follow all those who follow me (like you do), but not sure why? Any past posts I could read that explains your rational? Thanks for all you do!

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/michaelhyatt Michael Hyatt

      I actually responded to this a couple of times above. I probably should write a post on it.

      Obviously, I can't engage with 71,000 people. However, that many people (evidently) want to follow me, so great. I want to add value to them, even if I can’t engage with all of them.

      I use TweetDeck to manage my Twitter feed. I create different columns for family, friends, colleagues, etc. I actively engage with these folks, when it is appropriate. I reply to most non-spam DMs and many mentions.

      I hope that helps.

    • http://bondchristian.com/ bondChristian

      If you DM, you need to follow back. Plus, it just looks more social (I'm more likely to follow someone who follows back). Most power users use a client, so they're not actually watching their whole follower stream.

      -Marshall Jones Jr.
      My recent post How your serving can solve 3 problems with small group studies

  • Bianca Juarez

    You cease to amaze me. Thank you for being a well-spring of wisdom, friend!
    My recent post silent worship…

  • Bianca Juarez

    You cease to amaze me. Thank you for being a well-spring of wisdom, friend!
    My recent post silent worship…

  • http://www.john-gallagher.blogspot.com John Gallagher

    Mike, Thanks for sharing. #6 is SOOOOO important for leaders. In any event, I think you cover it well. Realizing that you can only get 140 characters, some folks like to abbreviate. However, major grammatical (your when you’re is supposed to be used)and incorrectly spelled words drive me crazy. I would love for Twitter and Facebook to have spell check features!! John

  • http://twitter.com/MargoCarmichael @MargoCarmichael

    When some Followers are also friends in person, avoid discussing activities some of them were included in and others weren't. Plus, answering only a few, as in a clique. Exclusion and hurt feelings undo influence.

  • http://www.silkcreek.com Gina Murrow

    Another Twitter mistake I see is posting many Tweets in a row (like 7, 8 or more). It fills up my home page with Tweets from only one other person & looks like a log jam. Space out your tweets.

  • http://www.twitter.com/danieldecker Daniel Decker

    Great list. My only contribution here is: QUANTITY DOESN'T ALWAYS EQUAL QUALITY. I've seem way too many people who are new to social media approach it the wrong way. They come in wanting to grow a massive following but don't realize that it's not the # that matters most, it's the level of engagement. I'd rather have 200 engaged followers than 2000 who don't. If I do it right and enage the 200 then they will grow to 2000 engaged and more…

    • http://intensedebate.com/people/michaelhyatt Michael Hyatt

      Amen. It’s like any other conversation. Don’t just add to the noise level; contribute something off value to the conversation.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/vinthomas Vin Thomas

    All good suggestions. My beef is with the @reply that should be a DM. That one really bugs me. And if someone @reply's me when it should be a DM, I'll just reply with a DM. Then they get the hint (hopefully).
    My recent post Joining Others in the CFCC

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/SynapticLight Phillip Gibb

    darn, I wanted to answer like that kid in Sixth Sense when he says in a scary metronome like whisper "All the time" but then I read the list. I'm not that bad, {pat back}, but I do find that I ask more that I can give, hmmm, and use the reply when I should use the direct message (when I am being followed by the person in question) – there is always stuff to work on :)
    My recent post What’s so Hot about Nuke?

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/michaelhyatt Michael Hyatt

    I’m afraid I can be guilty of this when I am reading my RSS feed and finding lots of good stuff.

  • Pingback: Tweets that mention Do You Make These 8 Mistakes When You Twitter? -- Topsy.com

  • http://bondchristian.com/ bondChristian

    How did I miss your reply, Michael? I thought I just checked if you had replied. Oh well – sorry for the duplicate info.

    -Marshall Jones Jr.
    My recent post How your serving can solve 3 problems with small group studies

  • http://www.theresaipfroehlich.com Theresa Ip Froehlich

    I know I make mistake #8. I haven't figured out a way to engage and stay engaged in the conversation while having all the other websites to maintain. It's also developing a new mental attitude or habit.
    My recent post Welcome

  • http://twitter.com/KarynBrownlee @KarynBrownlee

    #5 is definitely tricky. For one thing, just because you follow @SteveJobs doesn't mean all your followers do. So depending on how someone is engaged on Twitter, ie TweetDeck, search columns, lists, web, mobile, etc, that person may or may not have access to @SteveJobs side of the conversation. But on the other hand, if you love @SteveJobs ideas, then he may be someone worth following. I have met many a friend this way. I only have more thoughts on this one, no additional suggestions. It's definitely something to monitor, and I think your ratio is a good guideline to keep in mind. ____Great post to share. I will be RTing you. :)__

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/michaelhyatt Michael Hyatt

    Thanks for the RT. I saw it!

  • http://malindalou.wordpress.com MaLinda Johnson

    The "retweet button" eliminates the problem of needing to limit tweets to 120 characters in order to make them more retweetable. The only downside to this is that you can't add your own response when you use that button, but that would also only violate the 120 character rule. That guideline would have been useful a few months ago before the "retweet button" was available to everyone, but now seems out of date.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/michaelhyatt Michael Hyatt

    I’m personally not clear on this. If I try to use Twitter's new re-tweet function from within Tweetdeck, at the post is longer than about 120 characters, it turns red, indicating it is too long. I need to chase this down. Thanks for pointing this out.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/JerodMSF JerodMSF

    Great list Michael. I especially agree with the "don't tweet more than 120 characters" tip. Writing a tweet that is "retweetable" is so important if you want to use Twitter as a tool to spread influence. I know that I am far less likely to RT something from someone if I have to massage the text to fit underneath the character limit.

    One thing I would add, and it piggybacks on your "Not creating a good profile page" tip, is do not constantly change your picture if it is not clearly you. When I am using TweetDeck I become accustomed to the pictures next to each person's tweets. A lot of people use logos and other images that have nothing to do with them and they change often. I find myself realizing days/weeks later that I missed tweets from someone I like because I didn't realize they had a new picture.

    My best practice anyone: if you are actually interacting on Twitter, use a picture of yourself. It is so much more personal and inviting than some random image.
    My recent post Social Networking: Does the Buck Really Stop with Facebook?

  • winnie

    These are very very good points, and as far as the picture on twitter I have used my own logo which signatures me. Good READ!!

  • http://www.yourspiritualnutrition.com Christine Prescott

    Re tweeting during sports events: If one lives in a place where a game is not on TV, if one is following a small school team or if one does not have cable or satellite TV, Twitter is wonderful. It’s like being right at the game. I say, “Tweet on!”

©2010 Michael Hyatt, Powered by Standard Theme

Want to know how to get published? Check out this step-by-step guide. Click here!