On Friday morning of last week, my friend Anne Jackson (aka, “@Flowerdust”) challenged me to a 48-hour Twitter fast. At first, I said, “no.” But the more I thought about it, the more I liked the idea. I thought it would give me some insight into Twitter and the role it plays in my life.
So, I accepted the challenge at 11:29 a.m. on Friday, December 18th. I posted this tweet: Unfortunately, I had scheduled a tweet via SocialOomph.com to post at 12:10 p.m. and forgotten about it. Not aware that this was an automated tweet, some followers called me out on it. So I re-set the clock and began my Twitter fast from that point. At 12:10 p.m. on Sunday, December 20, I posted this tweet: I would think I learned three things from this experiment: However, I had no idea this same phenomenon would apply to Twittering. It just didn’t occur to me. Once I stopped posting, the growth rate dropped from an average of about 380 per day to less than 100. It has also taken a day to begin to recover. I am still not back to my previous growth rate. But, as I have argued elsewhere, Twittering just doesn’t take that much time—even if you post 12-15 times a day, as I do. I didn’t experience increased focus or any big productivity gains as a result of my fast. I also didn’t suffer any significant withdrawal pains. No twitches or night sweats. But without Twitter, I didn’t really have a way to share my discoveries. Several times I found myself reading something and thinking, This is great. I need to Twitter a link to it. Then I remembered, Oh yea, I can’t do that. I’m on a Twitter fast. I also missed reading other people’s tweets and learning from them. My experiment was hardly scientific. Maybe I am unique. Regardless, it was interesting and worth doing. Thanks to Anne for challenging me to do it!



Please note: I reserve the right to delete comments that are snarky, offensive, or off-topic. If in doubt, read My Comments Policy.